This weekend, Kanye West stirred up a storm on social media by defending Diddy’s assault on Cassie, describing it as ‘true love,’ while releasing merchandise linked to the incident.
Kanye West’s online activity took a controversial turn when he defended Diddy’s violent actions against Cassie through a series of posts on X, formerly known as Twitter. He described the assault as an expression of ‘true love,’ suggesting that intense emotions could lead to such extremes.
West’s justification didn’t stop there. He questioned his followers, asking if public assaults should be labeled as domestic violence or merely public indecency. This alarming perspective drew widespread backlash, with many condemning the rapper for his insensitivity and warped justifications.
Ye, as he’s now known, further fueled the controversy by launching a ‘Love Hoodie’ on his website, identical to the one Cassie wore during the assault. This move was perceived as an attempt to profit from a painful event, which social media users found particularly appalling.
Kanye West’s actions did not garner support from Cassie or the public. Many labeled his behavior as ‘evil,’ with some taking to social media to express their disapproval, suggesting West is ‘going to Hell’ for his actions. The hoodie’s sale, while commercially successful, cast a shadow over his reputation.
Kanye’s antics weren’t limited to this incident alone. His support for Diddy, who is facing serious legal charges, included calls for help from former President Donald Trump. Moreover, his declaration as a ‘racist’ and admiration for Hitler only added fuel to the fire of public outrage.
Despite being banned from X for this tirade, Kanye West hinted at future plans to create his own Discord channel, suggesting that his controversial commentary is far from over. Whether this is a ploy for attention or genuine belief, it has left fans and critics questioning his motives.
Kanye West’s recent actions and statements have sparked a wave of criticism, highlighting the dangers of using public platforms to justify violence. His choice to profit from such controversies raises ethical questions and deepens public concern over his influence and intentions.